2012年1月5日星期四

Confirmed: Nutrition Doesn't Explain Right-Wing Attacks on Michelle Obama

The dawning of an election year is certain to bring more attacks on Michelle Obama from the far-right press, which for years has unleashed an unprecedented barrage of name-calling assaults on the First Lady; wow gold assaults that in the past would have been deemed unthinkable by even partisan opponents who routinely avoided targeting First Ladies and their mostly ceremonial duties.

But runescape gold conservatives like Michelle Malkin have trampled that common sense tradition and now routinely, and gleefully, uncork all sorts of sordid smear campaigns against Michelle rs gold Obama.

But to hear them tell it, it's all the First Lady's fault. Conservatives become unglued because Obama's so busy pressing their buttons with her nutrition activism, which apparently drives | swtor credits them bonkers and causes staffers at Fox News to fabricate fairy tales.

According to the haters, what kind of conservative wouldn't be offended by the Nanny State rhetoric emanating from the White House, | swtor credits with all that big government hand-wringing about people eating too much food, when everyone knows the answer to obesity is to just eating less food, and that exerting a little personal responsibility can cure this | swtor credits problem overnight.

Indeed, the guttural response to the First Lady 's nutritional efforts has been so strong the right-wing media now practically campaign in favor of obesity, applying the simple, albeit deranged, rule that if Michelle Obama supports healthy food and exercise, it must be bad.

The First Lady's incessant critics insist intrusive nutrition activism goes way too far and invites their angry response. I mean, just look at this goody-goody health rhetoric:

没有评论:

发表评论